.

Monday, December 30, 2013

Medical Marijuana

Brian White Mrs. Perri Lampe Introduction to American National Politics 14 November 2001 Medical Marijuana Heading:         U.S. vs. Oakland cannabis Buyers cooperative and Jeffrey J matchlesss.         The U.S. absolute speak to ruled unanimously on Monday, may 14,2001. Facts:         Oakland Cannabis Buyers conjunctive violated the Controlled Substances Act in distributing hemp. The govern approach found the acc pulmonary tuberculosisd guilty. After the Cooperative keep to open to people it was placed in contempt and its exoneration that the distributions were all important(p) health checkly were rejected. The Ninth Circuit motor hotel of Appeals state that checkup exam requirement is a legally recognizable defense. However, the authoritative Court held up the decision of the District Court. Marijuana is assort as a schedule I controlled substance, which says there is scarcely one exception to the Act?government app roved research. figure:         Whether national law should allow distribution and possession of marijuana if it is turn out a medical necessity, though it violates the Controlled Substances Act. conclusion:         The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative was in invasion of the federal law, regardless of its defense of medical necessity.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Due to the feature that the Controlled Substance Act specifically states the just exception for the use of marijuana is for government research the Cooperative is unable to pursue in their claim that medica l necessity is an exception. The court dec! lared that Congress examined the issue and came to the conclusion that locoweed marijuana holds no medical value. As a declaration of this statement, Cooperative cannot subdue the rule of the court to shut knock off by over again arguing it was fulfilling a medical need. Justice Breyer omitted himself from the case since his buddy made the first ruling to close down the buyers concerted at the lower level. If you pauperization to get a wax essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment