Examine the ways in which feminism has contributed Essay

Examine the ways In which femlnlsm has contributed to our understanding of families Feminists take critical views of the family as they bespeak it oppresses women and and then creates issues such(prenominal) as unequal divisions of domestic help promote and domestic violence against women. Feminists believe that there is a triple burden of paid work. domestic fight and emotional work. to a fault gender Inequality Is non regarded as natural or Inevitable, but something that has been created by society. Feminists also argue that the oppression of women is due to patriarchate.The New Right has been criticised by feminists such as Ann Oakley (1997) as it has a conservative and anti-feminist perspective on the family. The New Right is firmly opposed to family diversity. The New Right sees the nuclear family as the natural family and Is based upon organic biological differences between men and women. In their view, the nuclear family has clear-cut divisions of labour between the b readwinner-husband and homemaker-wife. Therefore leading to criticisms from feminists. Ann Oakley argues that the New Right wrongly attachs that husbands and wives economic consumptions are fit(p) by biology.She also believes that the New Right view of the family is a negative reaction against the feminist campaign for womens equality. Even more so, other feminists argue that the traditional nuclear family favoured by the New Right Is based on the patriarchal oppression of women and Is a fundamental cause of gender inequality. In this view, it prevents women operative and keeps them financially dependent on me. Feminism is often referred to as feminisms as it is acknowledge that the feminist label Is broad and a cover many types of feminist.The important types of feminists are Liberal, Marxist, Radical and Dfference. Liberal feminists such as Jenny Somerville (2000) believe that the main obstacle for women is the equality in attitudes, practices and law in which can be change d without any fundamental changes to the structure of society. They also are concerned with campaigning against sex discrimination and for equal rights and opportunities. Through people favouring and challenging the gender situation soclallsatlon In childhood, attitudes can then be changed towards roles In the family.Liberal feminists argue that womens oppression is gradually being overcome hrough the changing attitudes and changes in laws such as the Sex Discrimination Act (1975) which outlaws discrimination in employment. Even more so Liberal feminists hold a similar view to theorists such as Young and Willmott, although they do not believe full gender equality has been achieved in the family, they argue It has been a gradual arm. Through the gradual progress of changing attitudes, the ways In wnlcn cn110ren are soclallsea In tne Tamlly Is now OITTerent.Daugnters are socialised more equally to sons in the modern day compared to the past. However, ther feminists such as Marxist a nd Radical, criticise Liberal feminists for failing to challenge the underlying causes of womens oppression and for believing that changes in law or attitudes will be bounteous to bring equality. Marxist feminists and Radical feminists believe instead that far-reaching revolutionary changes to deep- root social structures are needed. Another type of feminist is Marxist feminism, and they argue that the main cause of womens oppression in the family is not men, but capitalism.Several functions are performed through womens oppression for capitalism, firstly that women reproduce he labour force, through their unpaid domestic labour and by socialising the next generation of workers and maintain the servicing of the current generation. Another function is that women absorb petulance that would otherwise be directed at capitalism. Wives are describe as takers of shit by Fran Ansley (1972) who acknowledges that women soak up the frustration of their husbands feelings due to the alienation and growing they suffer at work. This is a primary example for Marxists, as it explains manly domestic violence against women.Abbot and Wallace (1990) note that the main ause of domestic violence is the male perception that the partner is failing her duties. Dobash and Dobash (1979) also found that these duties tended to be about sex, m whizy and home making. Due to the male perception of the partner failing her duties, it is often resulted in the women believing that they deserved to be beaten. Also women are a reserve army of cheap labour, meaning that when extra workers are needed women shall be taken on to work, but as soon as they are no longer needed the employers let them go to return to their primary role as unpaid domestic labour.However, Radical feminists have been critical based on the emphasis is being put on capitalist forms of exploitation. They argue that patriarchy predates Capitalism which makes it a more significant explanation of female exploitation and oppress ion. Radical feminists argue that all societies have been founded on patriarchy and for radical feminists the differentiate division in society is between me and women. Radical feminists see men as the enemy as they are the source of womens oppression and exploitation. Also that the family and marriage are the key institutions in patriarchal ociety.Men benefit form womens domestic labour and from their sexual services, and they dominate women through domestic and sexual violence or the threat of it. Radical feminists argue that the family is the root of womens oppression, so therefore must be abolished. They also argue that the besides way to achieve this is through separatism, where women must live independently of men. Even more so, radical feminists argue for political lesbianism, which is the idea that straightaway relationships are ineluctably oppressive because they involve sleeping with the enemy.Germaine Greer (2000) argues for the creation of all-female or matrilocal ho useholds as an alternative to the heterosexual family. However, for liberal feminists such as Jenny Somerville (2000), radical feminists fail to make out that womens position has improved considerably with better access to Jobs, divorce and control over tnelr own Tertlll ty Somerville also argues tnat separatlsm Is unlikely to work as heterosexual attraction makes it unlikely that the conventional nuclear family will disappear. On the other hand, Somerville does agree that women have yet to chieve full equality.The feminist approaches already considered tend to assume that most women live in conventional nuclear families and that they share a similar experience of family life. However, difference feminists argue that women have very different experiences of the family from one another and so therefore cannot be generalised. For example, working-class and middle-class women, black and white women and lesbian and heterosexual women all share different experiences so therefore cannot be compared. Black feminists argue that by regarding the family solely on a source of ppression, white feminists neglect black womens experiences of racial oppression.The black family is positively viewed as a source of support and resistance against racism by black feminists. However other feminists argue that this approach neglects the fact that, despite such differences, women do in fact share many of the same experiences. For example, women face a greater risk of domestic violence and sexual assault and low-pitched pay compared with men. Feminism is criticised for ignoring the increased family diversity of families in the modern day, and although the nuclear family remains important, it is by no means the only family type.

Why Did the Us Introduce Marshall Aid

Why did the US introduce marshall Aid? The briny reason why the US introduced Marshall Aid was to prevent the spread of fabianism. In 1946 almost the social unit of Eastern Europe was Communist, this was due to the actions of Stalin, he wanted to build up a line of countries virtually Russia and use them as a buffer zone to protect the USSR from being attacked. Britain had troops in Greece and was armed combat a Civil War against the Communists in fear that it too would fall under Stalins Communist rule.The regular army stepped in when the British announced that they could no longer afford to keep their troops in Greece, Truman feared that the all of Eastern Europe would become Communist (the idea of Communism was very popular in time of hardship, the communists believed that the wealth of the richest people should be shared out among the poor) so he agreed to pay for troops supplies, weapons, economic aid and British troops to be sent to Greece and Turkey.The USAs aid soon became known as The Truman Doctrine. This was the idea that communism should not be allowed to grow and gain territory, and that it was Americas duty to fight for liberty. It was agreed that they would send resources to each Government that was threatened by communism. The Truman Doctrine was significant as it divided the world, showing that capitalist economy and Communism were in opposition, which suggested that the East and the West could no longer co-operate.This emphasised the many difference between them. The Marshall broadcast started the Truman Doctrine in June 1947, when it was announced that $17 billion should be given to Europe to cooperate rebuild their inefficient economy and prevent the spread of communism. For the USA, Marshall Aid was introduced to make the idea of Capitalism appear more appealing, it was also introduced to try and prevent communism spreading.This now highlights how terrified they were of Communism and to what consequence they would go to prevent it influencing the whole of Europe. For the countries in Europe that received aid through the Marshall Plan it was seen as a way of rebuilding their economies and preventing communism in their own country.

The Dilemma of Cloning

Our era is considered to be the period of discoveries focusing mostly in the spheres of technical and medical research. Some scientists withal dargon to omen our century, as well as the end of the previous one, the new scientific revolution. Mevery prominent scientists and researchers gave their lives in order to be heard, in order to keep to their words and defend their views on the newly observed essence of many things our planet, Solar system and of course, the complexities of being a human.More so, many scientists and experts suffer been intrigued by the mysterious nature of human beings and out of curiosity numerous studies have been conducted as an attempt to come upon and discover new fascinating things about human beings. Other experts would go beyond the norm to entrance the extent of the limitations of humans as living beings.One of the most controversial and most anticipated researches on humans is re-create which is the process of creating of a duplicate genetic c opy of another. In an effort to however studies about human copy, scientists have ventured into animal cloning. Now that a cloned cat is a reality, pet owners may wonder when they will be able to duplicate their own kitty or pooch (Wood 1).Nowadays, battalion be not scrutinized or criticized based on their scientific views because the present society is far more democratic and liberal compared to previous years. However, relatively recent events connected with the research of cloning have be that investigation in the cell domain may lead to the whole range of medical, ethical, religious and even political disputes. Present day medical apprehension had made an extensive and significant undertaking that extensive the boundaries of human knowledge but breaking the limitations can either enrich mankind with new useable knowledge or yield visible harmful effects and destructive consequences.Stem cells themselves would not have caused such a thunderstorm of critique if not for t he source of their extraction. The point is that scientists believe that stem cells interpreted from living organisms have the highest trans ashesational potential and can better serve as the precursors for the whole variety of cells in the living body of an animal.However, the very idea that these cells are extracted from living embryos, rough multitude considers this a form of a murderous act. In fact, not all the people are aware of the real side regarding embryonic cell research. It is not a secret that stem cells are taken from surplus embryos, which are more likely not going to be useful for particular purposes in the future.In the member Where on the Web Register to Clone Your Pet by Christina Wood, it stated that the cost of pet cloning is about $895 and up and after there is an annual fee of $100 per year. More so, people provoke in cloning their pets have to fall in a vet to collect the pets trim sample. Obviously, clones do not come cheap. The cost, when the techno logy is perfected, could start at nearly $20,000 (Wood 1). It is important to stress that any science or research should be primarily useful to mankind for the present time and in the succeeding years.Animal cloning and stem cell research should be developed only if it does not harm mankind and if it generates positive changes, or at least reduces all negative effects to a minimum. harmonise to Wood, hundreds of people already store pet DNA with GSC disregarding the fact that there are many stray cats and dogs in animal shelters that need to be adopted. This situation shows that people would rather pay thousands of dollars to replicate the genes of their pets (take note that pet when cloned will not be a carbon copy of the superior pet which contradicts the definition of cloning) instead of caring for real animals that are in need of love and care.Furthermore, people should not forget about ethical and moral aspects of pet cloning and possible dangers of this scientific endeavor. According to ethical principles cloning is not accepted in certain countries and is restricted by some government. Although some scientists may accept the risks in order to benefit and stand up for further rapid culture of stem cell research, there is no guarantee that casualties can be reduced to zero. Every science is worthy of attention and further development of it should benefit the whole of mankind. Therefore, the first and foremost objective of cloning and stem cell research should be the promotion and delivery of advantages to mankind where everyone can benefit from it.

The Progression of the American Musical

The orb Two abundant authors of the Statesn melodic mansion, Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II, had one gross idea. They wanted to present to the American public a tonic, revolutionary musical theater that would stand out among the rest. They wanted to make an impact on the societies of the earned run average. They wanted to be creative and do something that was considered rebellious. When they fin in in ally combined their ideas together they created an American masterpiece okay.This was the world-class Rodgers and Hammerstein collaboration, starting the or so booming creative artnership in the history of American musical theatre. In the years before okay was created, Broadway was dying. untried and refreshing musicals were a rare occasion and when an artist tried to create something that he hoped his audience would like, he was sadly disap transfered. Broadway was suffering from a lack of what it was revered for astounding plays and musicals. Its sentence of glamour and glitz was near forgotten, and was in need of being saved.That is why okay is considered a rebirth of the American musical theatre at the time. It brought Broadway back to life, filling theatre seats with nthusiastic audiences who embraced the changes of this new theatre musical with open harness and made it a legend. okey set new standards for classic American theatre by introducing new techniques of presenting the musical to the audience, introducing a new genre of music into the theatre, and strayed away from the usual classic form and structure of a musical that audiences had grown used to.It was a time of change, a time of excitement, and a time of setting standards for the future. Almost from the first performance at the St. James Theatre on March 31, 1943, okeh has been recognized as a new kind of musical play that denied its Broadway audiences many of their most treasured traditions, says David Ewen in American melodious Theatre There was no coal scuttle let loose line of business, no chorus until midway through the first act, in fact. There was rather a serious ballet and some other serious overtones, including a killing in act two.The story, which was so simple, inspectmed to engage the audience in more(prenominal) than pure horizontaling diversion (248). These changes, far from disappointing to viewers, were upheld by a success that had never been seen in the history of musical theatre. He continued to say that with their first collaboration, Rodgers and Hammerstein shered in a new era for the musical theatre This beautiful folk play realized fully that which the earlier Rodgers and Hart musicals had been tune to obtain a synchronicity of all the grammatical constituents of the musical theatre into a single entity.At best Oklahoma could lay legitimate claim to spend a penny carefully woven a new element, spring, into the artful material of the modern musical. No hankerer would singers sing and then Dance was not a new element in the theatre realm. It had been used for years as a way of interpretation of feelings of a consultation that the writer or director wanted the audience to feel visually. Through movement, expression of those feelings was portrayed and helped the audience to somewhat experience that single emotion of fear, hate, get by, or guilt right along with the point of reference on stage. provided what was usual was that it was never brought together with the music and singing. The strain was usually followed by the decorative bounce. A song followed by a dance would usually lost the audiences attention, or even if the dance was too long or did not correspond to the song or story line what so ever. Rodgers and Hammerstein set a standard that incorporated the two elements (music/song and dance) so that the audience would ind more logic in the dance. It would come a meaning and a purpose in the play and heighten the excitement in the musical.And in many instances, it would furth er the plot or at best help the audience to fully deduct the individual characters feelings at that point in the musical. David Ewen uses the example of Agnes de Milles (choreographer of Oklahoma ) ballet, which brought to life the heroines dream and provided her motive for refusing the heros invitation to a box special. It was set aside-taking of the story. (248) According to Gerald Bordman, the author of American melodious Comedy, the idea hat integration, something new and urgently needed, took hold of Broadways thinking.In fact, it became so fashionable to integrate dance into the musical, that it was sometimes injected when it served no dramatic purpose, and sometimes even when it hindered the unfolding of the story. (160) After awhile dance became overused, which seemed to ruin what Rodgers and Hammerstein had set out to do (the incorporation of dance to heighten the meaning of the musical). Other writers or choreographers who inserted dance were not adding it when it woul d help the musical. Directors came to believe that dance was a necessity in a musical, for it was ne of the key reasons why Oklahoma as so successful. So the additions were made, but were not really thought about their purpose when they were added. What was forgotten was the obvious need for the dance at all. Dance was thought to be a want of the audience, not taking into consideration if the musical even required the dance at all. So, this problem developed into a frenzy, adding dance Just for the mere spectacle of it. But in Oklahoma , everything fit into its place. For the first time, not wholly were the songs and story inseparable, but in any case the dances heightened the drama by revealing he fears and desires of the leading characters.According to Bordman, Richard Rodgers once said, when a show works perfectly, its because all the individual parts complement each other and fit together in a great musical, the orchestrations sound the way the costumes look. Thats what made O klahoma work it was a work created by many that gave the conceit of having been created by one (160). collaboration. Joseph Swain adds that much was made at the time of the heros killing the villain on stage in Oklahoma. This too was not new. But while the claim to pilot burnerity was once over again exaggerated, Oklahoma virtue of its huge popularity, a popularity in no way reduced by an acrid scene, did open doors. (74) Oklahoma was in the genre of Musical Comedy, and many critics felt that villains and murder were not elements that should step up in a comedy. It was thought that such items would turn audiences away from Oklahoma , having the idea of going to see a comedy and leaving feeling like they had seen a murder mystery, and not laughing at all was not the main objective of comedy theatre. But once again, these elements were a key part of the musical. David Ewen pointed out in The Story of AmericasMusical Theatre that the original play had both villains and a murder, a nd Rodgers and Hammerstein had no end of removing them from their musical. Ewen quotes Hammerstein saying, We realized that such a course was experimental, amounting almost to the breach of an implied contract with the musical-comedy audience. I cannot say truthfully that we were worried by the risk. Once we had made the decision everything seemed to work right and we had the inner confidence hoi polloi feel when they have got adopted the right and honest approach to a problem (180).But once the doors unresolved and tickets began to sell and shows eventually became old out, Rodgers and Hammerstein really did not have anything to fear. Their show soon showed itself to be a success, even with a villain and a murder. The audiences were at first disturbed to see these elements in a comedy, but soon came into agreement with these new additions and liked its originality and creativeness. Also if these two elements had been removed, it would have disturbed the synchronization and union of all the other elements of song, dance and plot in the musical, which was what the writers were trying to avoid at all costs.Along with dance and villains, Rodgers and Hammerstein also took on a new pproach to forming the music that they included in the musical. In Gerald Bordmans minute of arc book American Musical Theatre A Chronicle, he stated that long before they wrote their first lyric to Oh What A Beautiful Mornin, Rodgers and Hammerstein had arrived at an all-important decision. The flotsam and Jetsam of musical comedy would have to be abandoned in translating a sensitive, poetic folk play for the musical theatre. Musical comedies traditionally opened with a big, crowded stage scene. Oklahoma ould begin simply a single character would be seen on the stage (a woman churning butter), and from off-stage would come the trains of the first song. Musical comedies usually started with a dazzling line of chorus girls from the stage aprons early in the production, but Rodgers and Hammerstein decided to delay its bearing until halfway through the first act (535). bring a certain magical and triumphant start-off to a musical, starting with excitement and volume. This was also criticized many feeling an audience would not stand for their most treasured attributes of a play being taken away.But Rodgers and Hammerstein once again took another risk, and it proved to be a risk that was not too bad to take. Audiences were at first disappointed with the deletion of the opening chorus, but eventually excused it, for they fell in love with the style of musical that Rodgers and Hammerstein were presenting to them. The play grew from a simple opening to a grand finale, which built the excitement of the audience and kept them stimulated and interest in the unfolding of the musical until the final chorus line and curtain call.It built suspense and a burning for more. Rodgers and Hammerstein obviously knew what they were doing, even if the critics thought they did not. Bordman also noted that the shows musical director, Jay Blackton, appreciating he works nature, discarded the common musical comedy practice of having the entire chorus sing only songs melodies. Instead, he reverted to the tradition of light opera and comic opera by dividing his singers and assigning them various parts, not always the principal melodic line (535).Once again, Oklahoma was making breakthrough innovations in the musical theatre world. A denial of basic characteristics of the original musical comedy could have upset the audience, and push Oklahoma into an area of outcast musicals that all writers fear. But Rodgers and Hammersteins ideas were undeniably refreshing to the American audiences. Rodgerss music also marked a new direction for the writer in Oklahoma. He reinvented his style of music from what he knew was popular to the audience to a confused flatness.Davis Ewen also states in his book The Story of Americas Musical Theatre, that most musical comedies expected t he music to be written before the lyrics, since the lyrics were something functional tacked on to the melody. But the writers were so determined to make each discussion an crucial part of the text that they agreed at once for Hammerstein to write the lyrics first, and Rodgers would write the music from the lyrics (180). Bordman reiterates that it is sometimes hard to realize that Oh, What A Beautiful Mornin is a waltz. The melody of The Surry With The Fringe On Top captures the clippety-clop of a horse pulling the vehicle.Rodgers long-sustained opening note of his title song coupled with the driving melody that follows was of the freshest inventions of the furcate and the impeccable blending of words and music in People Will Say Were In live Justifiably made it the most popular of the year. Much proclaiming ensued over how salutary the songs and plot were integrated (535). This coordination of musical rhythm and words was amazing. They were able to catch simple sounds of the a ctions on stage and incorporate them into the song, as if the lives of the characters could only survive with the music.This combination of audience must be made to believe that the characters life is a song. It is essential that the character make the audience feel like the music is not Just a dotty addition to the developing plot, but an existing item that has and will always exist at that point in time. The audience must be pulled into the world of the musical, not Just simply entertained. And once again, Rodgers and Hammerstein had achieved that goal. They ere well on their way to creating a musical that was so seamless that extracting one minor detail of it would bemuse the whole work of art off.It was a work of complete union and an accomplishment that was in no way easy to create in the first place. One factor in the success of Oklahoma that cannot be overlooked was the attitude of the American people at the time it was presented. In The World of Musical Comedy, Stanley Gre en adds that World War II was more than a year old when the musical opened, and those who remained at home were becoming increasingly aware of the heritage they enjoyed as a free people. Seeing the happier, sunnier years that were so much a part of this heritage gave audiences both an escape from daily headlines and a feeling of optimism for the future (212).In American Musical Comedy, Bordman believed that Oklahoma s importance lay elsewhere. The show made the American musical theatre look at Americas own heritage for inspiration (160). Playwrights were beginning to recognize the grand amount of inspiration the American country could provide for the new revolution of musicals. During the time of and after World War II, pride in America was gaining strength and so was the nterest of writing plays and musicals that showed that pride of how great America was. Oklahoma n turn brought more than Just new innovations of song, music, and dance to the stage, but a love for musicals that s howed how beautiful older American culture was. Oklahoma was a musical of Americas expansion into the western prior and the western culture. In more ways that one, Oklahoma was a way for city dwellers in in the buff York City who sat in the audience to find their way to the west without ever leaving the city. Rodgers and Hammerstein had undergo achievement when they could tell a story through song and dance and transport the udience into the setting of the musical.Playgoers would leave the theatre feeling like they had Just returned from an adventure out west, which is a playwrights exclusive objective when creating a play. The audience must be made to believe that they are experiencing the plot right along with the actors on stage. Thus is the main objective of theatre in general to capture the audience and bring them to a different place and time where the plot of the play is the only struggle in the world at the time. Bordman writes in American Musical Theatre A Chronicle that what started in 927 was perfected in 1943 when Oklahoma premiered.It is considered by many to be the first musical comedy to have a plot, musical account statement and dances that were necessary ingredients to advance the story line (536). It is only fair to agree with him. Rodgers and Hammerstein added the exact ingredients to create a magical and over the world to this day. Although Oklahoma premiered 70 years ago, and its style of music and dance have grown old with the passing of time, it still demands respect for its combination and imaginative ideas that revolutionized the musical industry at the time. Rodgers and Hammerstein were the dominant force in musical comedy in the 1940s and 50s.Even their flops had notable songs. Several of their shows became successful films. Oklahoma s importance in opening a new era in the American Musical Theatre will never be challenged. It has become an American classic that society will eternally treasure for its beautiful integration of son g and dance.

In Broad Daylight: Message and Moral Essay

After hunger, sex is the most properly drive in forgivings. In the event of non-fulfillment of this drive, one may turn to evil ways of sprightliness by which is meant resorting to actions not considered right and attendant with unpleasant consequences. Though the story In Broad daylight is not purposely intended to be a story with strong social message, its author, Ha Jin, inadvertently establishes a universal truth that evil begets evil. The term evil has two connotations, one at rigorously personal and individual level and the second at collective and societal level. On an individual level, human race emotions and desires demand freedom of satisfaction.One does not mind defying customs and systems and wants absolute rights as a human being. Mu Ying, principal character of Ha Jins story and a lady past her prime, indulges in prostitution as she has been dissatisfied with the physical aspects of her relationship with her conserve Meng Su (Jin 84). She pleads with other woman to consider her case on human basis (Jin 84). Physical gratification is a matter of personal choice but it comes into involution with regulatory aspect of society which to promote a stable system denounces physical gratification extracurricular wedlock and makes it punishable as adultery.The more primitive and backward the society, like China during times of commie Revolution, the more barbaric the punishment. Mu Yings thrashing a red guard for not paying her specie results in her public humiliation and atrocious death at the hands of Red Guards and suicide of her husband (Jin 88) evil begetting evil. The author Ha Jing has not raised any question of morality. He has simply draw the incompatible conduct of a person and its disastrous repercussions.

Drilling Engineering Lab Report

Lab Report DRILLING FLUID ( muck) DENSITY Objective The school of this experiment is to determine the bumble density, specific gravity and hydrostatic pressure gradient for piss-based- screw up, WBM (Drilling fluid) using the OFITE mud balance. Theory Drilling fluids be used during the drilling of boreholes, either for oil healthys or water boles holes. One of the major functions of a drilling fluid includes providing hydrostatic pressure to prevent formation fluids from get into the wellbore.To ensure that the hydrostatic pressure balances out with formation pressure and that the wellbore is stable, the mud density has to be taken into consideration. Higher formation pressure require higher mud density (this can be achieved by adding more barite to the drilling fluid) and vice versa. Using an incorrect drilling fluid (in terms of its mud density), can result in a formation damage thereby leading to a well blowout. Equipment and Materials The mud density is determined using t he mud balance shown in Fig. 1.This 4-scale instrument provides an accurate look to measure some parameters which are Fig. 1 * Density in ppg and pcf * Specific gravity * Pressure gradient in PSI/1000ft) The balance uses the cantilever design (fixed somewhere on the lever arm). The cup is attached to one end and the counter weight on the other end. The lever arm is calibrated, the rider as well as acts as a counterweight and there is a level glass to determine when the instrument is balanced. A thermometer is also required to measure the temperature of the drilling fluid to be tested. Procedure The instrument was wiped down and thus place in the carrying case. * The temperature of the first drilling fluid (water) was noted down * The mud cup got alter up with the drilling fluid and covered. It got wiped down due to the run over liquid from the sides and the opening on the lid. This overflowing shows that the trapped gas/air bubbles, if any, have been expelled and the cup is pr operly full. * The rider is then moved on the arm to find the equilibrium position i. e. when the bubble in the level glass is in the middle. * The readings are then taken. The cup is rinsed out and wiped down, ready for the next drilling fluid. * The procedure is repeated again, to find the details of the drilling fluid and all results are recorded in a table. Table of Results WATER MUD SAMPLE Temperature, ? 19. 60 17. 00 Specific Gravity 1. 00 1. 04 Density, lbm/ft3 (pcf) 62. 00 65. 00 Density, lbm/gal (ppg) 8. 30 8. 70 Density, Kg/m3 1000. 00 1043. 00 Pressure gradient, psi/1000ft 430. 00 455. 00 Mud gradient = 8. 7 x 0. 052 = 0. 45 psi/ft Density in g/cm3= 8. 7/8. 345 = 1. 04 g/cm3

COM Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

COM - Essay Exampled allows for the viewer to promote incorporate with the action that is taking place on the screen, the theme of the movie itself, and whether or not the actors were eventual(prenominal)ly credible in their cases.Firstly, with regards the medication which was utilized in the film, this is perhaps the strongest element that helps to tie the plot in with the ultimate reason of frustration, suspense, and drama that is represented on the screen. All too often, films simply seek to fill a musical score with something so that this potential element will be fulfilled. However, with regards to the film in question, the music was expertly presented so that the drama, suspense, and anguish that were represented within the scenes could be evoked to a more climb and complete degree.Another definitive element that helps to set this film apart from many others is with respect to the style in which the actors which were chosen were perfectly suited and believable in the r oles that they reflected. Although it is of course possible that a occur of different actors could of been chosen facilities role in just as satisfactory a manner, the way in which Franka Potente was able to represent a steelish determination alongside a fragile an almost childlike sense of never giving up hope, denotes the fact that this actor was perfectly cast and richly believable with regards to the role which she was required to portray.Similarly, the theme of the movie itself is ultimately a suspense/thriller. In such a way, the previous(prenominal) two elements that have been discussed, both work favorably in helping to promote a further level of enjoyment on the part of the viewer with respect to this particular genre film. Although there argon a number of best practices that can be engaged in any film, in recount to effectively represent the thriller/suspense genre, is of course necessary to have a set of actors that are fully believable within the role, able to repres ent key emotions, angst, anger, frustration, fear, sadness, and an